Posted on Friday March 27, 2020

Updated on Monday October 18, 2021


1 March 2020 to 30 June 2021
Add to calendar

How-to guide for labelling cultural heritage

This Task Force aimed to assess the feasibility, and provide instructions to replicate in different jurisdictions, a decision-making schema for cultural heritage institutions that helps them identify copyright and neighbouring rights in their collections and select the correct rights statement when making them available online. 

A house beside a river with windmills in the distance
Title: Molen bij een rivier
Date: 1770 - 1814
Institution: Rijksmuseum
Country: Netherlands
Public Domain

Background

As cultural heritage becomes more and more accessible online, it opens up possibilities to support research, education, life-long learning, and creativity. Cultural heritage institutions holding works in their collections might have information on the rights holders, publication dates, or other factors that may help make a copyright determination. If the institution wants to encourage the reuse of the digital cultural heritage it displays, their copyright assessment should be communicated to users in a simple and comprehensible way. Displaying digital objects online with no indication of how they can be used can easily be perceived as an “all rights reserved” notice by users and therefore limit the reuse possibilities.

A set of tools exist that can fulfill this purpose, namely the ones developed by Creative Commons and by the Rights Statements Consortium. Cultural heritage institutions and aggregators worldwide have started using these rights statements in their online repositories. Applying them adequately, however, requires some copyright knowledge. One should first have an understanding of whether the item is in copyright or not, and whether additional conditions apply that the end user should note. An added challenge of course is that sometimes the necessary information to make such determinations is missing

At the Europeana 2019 conference, Juozas Markauskas and Jurga Gradauskaité presented a tool and handbook developed for the National Library of Lithuania that guided cultural heritage professionals through the choice of selecting an accurate rights statement. The tool has helped many cultural heritage practitioners in Lithuania with little or no legal knowledge to make more accurate decisions on what rights statement to use, in a consistent manner.

The possibilities to create more support were explored as part of this Task Force.

Relation to the Europeana Strategy 2020-2025

The Task Force contributed to the following priority from the Europeana Strategy 2020 - 2025: '1. Make it easy and rewarding for Cultural Heritage Institutions to share high-quality content.' It was also relevant to another element of the Strategy, which makes reaching a higher quality of rights information one of its top #3 priorities, noting that “we [the Europeana Initiative] will build capacity among our data partners so that they feel empowered and informed to make decisions around copyright, both when sharing collections with Europeana and through their own portals/platforms”. 

This Task Force aimed at facilitating the replication of a tool that has proven very useful in Lithuania to other jurisdictions and languages to hopefully facilitate this type of decision making elsewhere and contribute to further copyright education and accurate rights information.

Goals 

The report seeks to:

  • Contribute to increase the level of copyright knowledge across the cultural heritage sector

  • Provide a tool that helps showcase necessary considerations in rights labelling in educational activities

  • Contribute to increase the accuracy of rights information assigned to digital cultural heritage online

  • Contribute to ease the understanding of (and facilitate going through) the relevant considerations in the selection of a rights statement

  • Facilitate the adaptation of a useful tool to different jurisdictions

  • Support the accessibility of the material by making multilinguality possible

  • Harmonise rights labelling practices across Europe based on the Europeana Licensing Framework, thus facilitating the rights statement choice when contributing data to Europeana.

Outcomes

The Task Force produced a final report explaining the steps that need to be undertaken to convert the system that already exists in Lithuania to other jurisdictions. More specifically, it provides:

  • A flowchart with an overview of the questions and answers that a cultural heritage institution can go through

  • A list of the questions included in the flowchart with a description for each that acts as a clarification 

  • Additional rights clearance or rights labelling tools developed in other countries or regions that provide useful examples to potentially replicate as well

  • A set of instructions on the steps to follow, including how to use open source technology, and bring in the questions, answers and descriptions to your interactive tool, and tips to use the tool as a complement to copyright training activities

View the flowchart, or download both the flowchart and the report below. 

Members

top