This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By clicking or navigating the site you agree to allow our collection of information through cookies. Check our Privacy policy.

2 minutes to read Posted on Thursday September 24, 2015

Updated on Monday November 6, 2023

Rembrandt vs Leonardo - some brief feedback from Research Data Alliance workshop

main image


Europeana Research spoke at the Research Data Alliance workshop on infrastructures for linguistics this week. A key, if obvious, conclusion was how useful open data is for research.

Based on some early position papers from earlier events in Paris and Rome, a key theme of the workshop was openness of data; Europeana spoke on its work on open data and how they could help researchers exploit cultural heritage data better.

One of the key talking points was how cultural heritage institutions are moving at different paces in terms of openness.

A good example of this was metadata records for Rembrandt's painting The Night Watch, with the record for the Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa. Because the two museums and related aggregators have different policies for how open their data is, the quality of record on Europeana is very different.

For the researchers in the audience, this made a big difference. The Night Watch was more likely to be found, provided greater scholarly context and trust, and was openly licenced to allow for reuse in teaching and research.

A quick visual glance at the two make is easy to understand the difference, in terms of numbers of fields, quality of description and the licencing of the actual content.

The full presentation is here. Thanks to Dieter van Uytvanck from CLARIN for organising the workshop

top